Are there any questions now in connection with this topic?
QUESTION: Can you elaborate on the subject of holding
on to control leading to loss of control?
ANSWER: When the conflict exists of "me versus the
other," a strong control must be exerted. This control says, "I must hold
on to myself, for otherwise I will be damaged." This control is based
on a wrong conclusion, comes out of a dualistic concept of life, and therefore
must be a damaging and limiting control. It puts shackles on your best
faculties and prevents the best faculties of others to reach and affect
you. The best in you cannot come out and reach others. The best in others
cannot reach you. (I speak here to everyone.)
This control is a tight wall, consisting of fear and a belief
of duality, where man must defend himself against life by withholding the
best he is and the best he can be. This erects an impenetrable wall of errors
and defenses. Therefore, the stronger the control, the greater the wall, and
the further man is alienated from the best in himself and others, from all
that is true, real, constructive, alive, and blissful. Behind the wall, he
suffers separation from the best of life, which includes the best of himself.
When energy is constantly being used in a fruitless and futile
way, such as building up walls that prohibit the best of life, the moment
must come when the entity loses control, and is therefore not capable of coping
with life, as it unrolls itself for him. He is unable to make use of his assets
because he is almost frightened to find them. Finding them, being aware of
them, leads to a natural flow of union, of letting others partake of them.
This is the nature of anything good. Good cannot exist by itself. It must
communicate itself to others. It always includes others. Hence, when a person
fears such inclusion with and by others, he is forced to deny the best in
himself. This can be verified by all of you when you detect a slight feeling
of anxiety and discomfort at the very idea of allowing the best in you to
unfold. There is a mechanism which holds you back, which makes it appear "safer"
to be barren, unproductive of aspects which are naturally bent to include
and unite with life and others. The irony, of course, is that without these
assets man cannot adequately live and cope with anything he encounters. Therefore,
the control (prohibiting himself and guarding himself from life) must lead
to a loss of control (inability to cope, in whatever fashion this may manifest
for an individual).
When man is in the unity of being, where there is no either/or,
where it is "me and the other," then no conflict exists between giving and
receiving. There can be no conflict of control. If you do not fear giving,
you can fully receive, you can never be shortchanged. When you fear giving,
you can never be open to receive, it is impossible. Therefore you are constantly
being shortchanged. Therefore the wrong conclusion is strengthened, so that
you close yourself up even more. But when you are in the truth of unity, your
freedom to offer what you are to life, to want to enrich life, will make you
completely comfortable about receiving. You can easily determine this fact,
all of you. To exactly the extent you fear giving of yourself, you must be
uncomfortable when you receive, even though you want to receive. So you subtly
push aside what is given to you, even though your childish, selfish aim is
to receive as much as possible and give as little as possible, it cannot be.
Not only because others refuse such an unfair deal, but because you yourself
close up against it. Your psyche cannot respond to the truth and the law --
hence it cannot open itself to receive when it refuses to give. It is more
than guilt, more than the deep knowledge that you do not deserve to receive
when you refuse to give, more than atonement for this guilt that makes you
refuse to receive. It is a simple question of a mathematical equation, or
like a law of physics. These laws cannot be broken, they contain their own
order. It is a question of psychic compatibility. Only the psyche that is
in truth, and that can therefore comfortably and painlessly give the best
it is(there is a difference between giving what one has, even one's
assets, and giving what one is), will experience the great safety and joy
of this act, and can consequently, in exact proportion, comfortably, painlessly,
and joyfully receive -- until the aspects of giving and receiving truly become
one. When there is no effort about giving of oneself, there will be no effort
in receiving, and no frustration. The person will no longer feel cheated,
because he does not cheat life by withholding from it what he is. Hence, tight,
anxious control becomes utterly superfluous.
The control which prohibits one's best must, perforce, also
prevent the individual from using these best, highest powers for his own advantage.
These powers remain unused, they are covered up, to a degree that their existence
is ignored. That aspect of man which alone is competent to guide and inspire
him cannot activate him as long as man remains in this condition.
I will leave you tonight with the request and the wish and
the hope that all of you present here, and those who read these words, use
the formula I gave you. Use it as much as you can. Want to use it. It will
be such a healing power. It will change what is dull and dead into a dynamic
lifestream. It will change what is hopeless into bright hope; what is fearful
into security and confidence; it will change your life from constriction into
limitless possibilities; it will change darkness and isolation into light,
union, companionship, intimacy, and the knowledge that you are loved as you
are. It will change from aloneness and emptiness to abundance in every respect.
My friends, these are not mere words, or theory you can vaguely believe in
for a distant future. It is verifiable for each one of you, whenever you choose
to test the truth of these words.
Be in peace, be in yourself, be in God.
The Guide
by Eva Pierrakos
November 26, 1965
Copyright 1965, by Eva Pierrakos
Back