QUESTION: Am I right in thinking that to be in a state of reality would be eventually an equivalent to being in a state of godhood?
ANSWER: Yes, of course. But when this state is sought artificially, because the task of developing the ego seems to become too great, then it is an erroneous way. The ego must be mastered. When I say "the ego," I mean everything that it has to deal with. Let us take an example. In a distorted view, the life of the outer man is often hard. Man has to work hard, he has to struggle for his subsistence and his survival. Distortion and misconception have brought man to this stage unnecessarily. At the same time man dreams of a state, which he will eventually find, where struggle no longer exists, where only bliss exists. An attempt to escape the struggle would be an erroneous way to strive for this state. The struggle corresponds to the ego. Only after the struggle has been positively accepted will it prove superfluous, and work and pleasure will become one. But evading work, because of the struggle, leaves important potentials in the psyche and the ego untended, unexplored. After such acceptance, an individual discovers the truth of the end of tediousness in daily survival relatively quickly. It is then that he realizes the God-like state to some degree, at least regarding daily struggle.
QUESTION: About the over-developed and under-developed parts of the ego: Would over-activity be a result of an over-developed ego, while passivity, in an unhealthy manner, would be a result of an under-developed ego?
ANSWER: Yes, that is correct. The functions of the ego further the state of becoming, whereas the real self is the state of being. Of course, from man's vantage point there is the misunderstanding that the state of being means no activity, whereas in fact activity is within the state of being. Activity and passivity blend as one harmonious cosmic movement.
QUESTION: Where I am unable to let go of my selfwill and therefore trust in God, that is where my ego is over-developed. Where I fear self-responsibility that is where my ego is under-developed. Is that correct?
ANSWER: Indeed. Where you do not dare to make your own decisions, where you lean on ready-made rules, there your ego is not sufficiently developed. And here you have a very good illustration of what I spoke of in this lecture: Because of one distortion, an opposite distortion is created. Because your ego is under-developed in those areas, something in you tries to attain the selfhood that you simultaneously deny when you refuse self-choice and self-responsibility. Since the entire process occurs in blindness, in lack of awareness, you choose the wrong way of attaining selfhood, namely selfwill. Concomitantly, your deep psyche feels that there should be a loosening up, and the clutching becomes a strain. You seek, in turn, this loosening up, again, in the wrong way, by not taking hold of your ego in making your own decisions. You rather choose to do what you are told in blind obedience to rules.
QUESTION: I find it very difficult to let go of the dependency I feel toward any person, possibly representing my father and mother. I have been quite aware of this. But what you said tonight about the reluctance of letting go, the childish desire for omnipotence, the dream for pleasure supreme -- all this seems to me to be an important factor. I don't think I realized this sufficiently until today. Could you perhaps explain to me how these two act together, making it difficult for me to let go?
ANSWER: Now, of course, it is very important that in your work you find specifically in what areas you do not wish to give up omnipotence, pleasure supreme, and the ease which the spirit longs for, where hardship does not exist, with all its apparent difficulty of assuming responsibility because it still seems a burden to you. You believe, in a corner of your being, that the childish state, with no adult responsibility, can be maintained by simply insisting that your parents continue to care for you. During your self-observation you must find in what specific ways this manifests in your emotional reactions.
QUESTION: I understand it, it is very clear. But isn't it a long way one has to go? One wants a certain experience, a certain pleasure, or a certain power; must I accommodate myself to the present circumstances, or can I reach out for whatever I want?
ANSWER: Yes, you can, and certainly you should reach out. But you can adequately reach out only if you trust that it can happen, and if you let it happen. But you want to do it with your outer ego deficiencies. That is where the ego cannot adequately serve you. This is a gross misunderstanding of the functions of the ego. You use your ego where it cannot serve you and you refuse to use it where it must serve you. You want to attain that pleasure with the limited scope and vision of the ego, with its limited possibilities, rather than through letting nature, life, and creation bring it to you in their own way. But you do not trust, because you do not let go. And you can only let go of this part of your ego when you have understood these things and when you use the ego faculties in their proper way -- for example, in stepping aside and claiming that different higher functions fulfill their role for you. When this interplay is learned and lived with, self-trust grows, and positive chain reactions between ego, real self, and universal forces are therefore set in motion.
QUESTION: Isn't the ego connected with selfwill?
ANSWER: Indeed. False ideas, as well as selfwill, are naturally a result of the ego world, and not of the real self. But it is also the faculty of the ego to give up both. Only the ego can do so. The ego is necessary in order to change its own mind and intent. It is necessary in order to understand that it has a false idea, that it does not have to operate on selfwill. It is up to the ego to either maintain or abandon these destructive facets. The ego alone is capable of exchanging the false idea for a truthful one. This means letting go of a tense, anxious selfwill, and replacing it with a relaxed, free-flowing, flexible will based on a discriminating reasoning power, and it means calling upon the intuitive levels of the self to make the choice for the higher inner guidance of the real self.
QUESTION: I cannot visualize how the law of karma and heredity works and how the process of birth takes place. The baby, being born, and the soul -- does the soul exist before the baby is born? How does that work?
ANSWER: Perhaps the best way for you to perceive these principles would be to think that the human body is a direct result of the personality which, of course, exists prior to the baby's birth. The personality's thinking, attitudes, emotions, and actions -- all of these have their result, their effects. The body with its environment, the life and the life situations, the personal "fate" are all effects of the mentality and the personality and the character. Not only your body, but your life conditions are a result of what you are. If you look at the question from this point of view, you will avoid a great deal of confusion. Karmic law, heredity, and specific conditions of birth are then no longer a problem. You may now perceive that the body is built by forces outside the personality. This creates confusion because such thinking occurs in a spirit of duality, rather than in a spirit of unity, where you would perceive that you, your body, your country, as well as every other factor in your life, is an immediate result of yourself.
QUESTION: It is difficult to feel that.
ANSWER: Of course. You must not try to force such a feeling. It will come by itself if you shelve this problem now, as far as feeling it is concerned. The more you comprehend cause and effect in your immediate life -- in areas where you may still be blind in this respect -- the more must the scope of inner experience of the real self as the central cause of its life extend and eventually prevail.
QUESTION: I suffer from occasional heart palpitations that have no organic cause. I have found in my work that this is due to repressed guilt. Is there self-punishment involved?
ANSWER: Yes. It is self-punishment, fear of punishment, and at the same time fear of and resistance to giving up that which causes the guilt in the first place. You have made good progress in your work. Now, if you uncover a level in which you do not want to give up any of the facets that create guilt, you will experience and you will have a profound understanding of your basic problem. Self-punishment is a substitute for giving up the guilt-producing attitudes. By doing so, you unconsciously believe that it is possible to maintain these attitudes and yet absolve yourself through the guilt. Therefore, you go on punishing yourself, believing that this makes up for not giving up the destructive patterns. If you say often enough how bad you are, if you suffer enough from your guilt, then you feel that you still are a nice person, in spite of maintaining what is, in actuality, of no conceivable advantage to you and to others. The specific realization of this level will come to the degree that you truly wish to find it. Your ego faculties will help you to shed the guilt-producing patterns. Even if something in you doubts, you may do so in the understanding that at any time you have the right to reassume them, should you so desire. This will strengthen your ego and you will succeed. You will no longer be a helpless prey, but you will take hold of yourself by using your ego in its proper way.
The Guide
by Eva Pierrakos
March 19, 1965
Copyright 1965, 1980 by Center for the Living Force, Inc.